This is the main flute aria in J.S. Bach's Magnificat, scored for two flutes, alto voice, and pizzicato continuo. It's quite a special aria in the entire work due to a number of compositional devices Bach uses to portray the text. I'd like to focus on the first two bars, which give us an idea for the rest of the piece. The aria begins with a curious rhythm in the flutes, with ties from beats 1 and 3 which roll over to beats 2 and 4. There are also these staccato marks. Altogether, these characteristics raise a couple of questions, and a variety of solutions can be heard in different interpretations. How do we shape this motif? Should the 16th note on beat 2 (A in Fl.1, C# in Fl.2) be emphasized, like the melody goes towards it? What kind of "shortness" do the staccatos mean and should we apply them everywhere, including notes which don't have staccato marked? I'd like to begin by drawing attention to the text - there's an emphasis on "emptiness" in different contexts, represented by the words hunger and empty (perhaps empty-handed). Esurientes implevit bonis et divites dimisit inanes. He hath filled the hungry with good things: and the rich he hath sent away empty. This leads me to think that a kind of light and airy way of playing would help illustrate the idea of emptiness. Notice also Bach chose using a pizzicato bass, which also contributes to the overall "aerated" expression. Thus I don't think it's necessary to play the staccatos in a dry, literal sense, but rather Bach is just telling us to play those notes with light separation, separated from the next beat. In measure 1, since these staccato notes are the 8th notes of that "short-long" rhythm, it's a way to prevent us from playing them really to their full value. In measure 2, the staccato is again an indication for us to somewhat clip that note lightly, which will also help us to place the trill nicely and start the trill clearly. (a nice example of where we'd stop the air gently with the tongue) We can also use the bass pizzicato as our reference – a short note with a bit of ringing resonance. In this piece, this would be my general treatment of all notes which need to be light. Now, Bach uses another way to show "emptiness", which is with that opening rhythm mentioned earlier. Beats 2 and 4 are “missing” due to the tie from the previous note. Some interpretations choose to accent that off-beat (notes with asterisk marked above). If we look at the harmonies though, these notes are perfect examples of “escape notes”, which are non-harmonic notes that are first approached by step and then resolved through a leap. It’s a short “escape” before the resolution. Escape tones are generally unaccented. OK, so who says that? Can we just slap on a general rule to explain this case? Let's look at where the important dissonances are. Looking at the first flute part, the held G# creates a 6-5 suspension with the B natural in the bass on beat 2, the resolution being the F#. The same pattern applies afterwards – the held over E creates a 4-3 suspension, resolving on a D#, again against the bass B natural. Accenting the escape tones (A and F#) would not create a release of tension, which is necessary in order for these suspensions to be effective. Also, not all dissonances are created equal. In this case, the suspensions are in the foreground of the harmonic structure and are supported by the escape notes (but they're not less important, it always takes two to tango). Having the escape tones sound just slightly after the beat and in diminuendo is Bach's ingenious musical response to the concept of "emptiness", and it would be a pity to miss out on that. With these points in mind, I hope they shed light on how we can effectively shape this motif! Happy Halloween!🧡🖤
0 Comments
I really enjoyed working with people in my "The Doctor is IN" session on Oct. 16th, where I coached my learners in a 20-minute lesson. I thought to talk about here some common issues regarding playing the baroque flute and hope some may find this helpful!
Managing airstream takes a lot of concentration and self-observing. It's really comparable to meditation I think, and small changes will make big differences. For the baroque traverso, the number one challenge many people have is reducing the airstream to be just the right amount and at the right speed. On top of that, many of the forked-fingering notes like G# or F-natural will have their own requirements such as a more specialized embouchure. This is why I recommend practicing scales and arpeggios so that we learn how to move between notes in the most efficient way and hitting the "sweet spot" of all notes each time. In close connection with that, feeling comfortable in using varied articulation is certainly one of the hallmarks in historical flute playing. This is no different from learning a language, and the only way to get more fluent is by doing it all the time. Again, practicing articulation with scales and arpeggios will help internalize the technique, make sure you also stop the sound with the tongue to gain clarity and control. Articulation is a source of great fun, as it creates so much expression and diversity with so little effort from us. In short, I definitely lean towards seeing technique and music-making as reducing, how to achieve the maximum with the minimum - easier said than done of course. As my former teacher Wilbert Hazelzet often said, "It's all just a part of the game!" ❓So a common question I get is asking about rules in historical performance. What are the rules for playing *fill in the blank*? I try to answer by saying: there are guidelines, and some are even pretty "set", but what's also necessary is to look at the context, listen, and make choices based on this process.
I thought to use a recent question I got as an example. The question concerns whether to place some of the ornaments in Hotteterre's Suite in D major on the beat or not. Let's look at the Sarabande "la "d'Armagnac". The circled ornament is a double port de voix, which occurs throughout the movement. But even if you didn't know anything about this ornament, there are usually other indications in the music which can help us to determine whether to play it on or before the beat. So in a sarabande, it makes sense to play it on the beat because of that characteristic sarabande emphasis on the second beat. Compare playing it both ON and BEFORE the beat, and you'll hear that playing before the beat won't give that clear rhythmic, LIFTING gesture. Also, what speaks for playing on the beat is that the ornament creates a slight dissonance with the C# in the bass, which adds harmonic richness and further enhances that second beat. A tierce de coulée (falling third) occurs, on the other hand, often at the ends of musical gestures, or kind of like "on the way to something". The general affect is also soft, flowing, maybe sighing, and so is usually played before the beat. Hotteterre's Menuet illustrates these concepts perfectly, and especially the string of tierce de coulées in the second line sets up an effective contrast against the rhythmically more obvious (and usual) opening phrase. In this second line, the thirds fall gracefully from the half note, avoiding a strong down beat and thus creating a metric displacement. Together with the bass line, we have for a short while here a very interesting juxtaposition of rhythmic details which makes this Menuet special! If you'd play the tierce de coulées here on the beat, the dance would lose these special qualities, become heavy, and go against the natural musical intentions. Now in the Prelude of this suite, we have something that sort of looks like it could be a tierce de coulée (see asterisk). What are some other clues in the music that can help us decide whether to play it on or before the beat? In this particular moment of the music, there's harmonic tension happening with that 7th chord underneath, and also since it's a Lentement in 2, placing the ornament on the beat helps contribute to the affect and metric structure. It should sound deliberate, a bit "heavy", and playing before the beat would then reduce the poignancy of the phrase. The same idea goes for the ornament after that. And see further in the next line, a tierce de coulée is appropriate after the G# as it brings a little closure before the leap up to the A, and it's also metrically the weakest part of the bar and naturally wants to fall from the preceding trill. Thus, better before the beat. So by looking at the context of the ornament we can also take some clues already about the expression, which would then help us to decide how we want to execute it. There's a musical meaning, rather than simply being a type of ornamentation with automatic "rules" on how it should be played. Here's another upload for the Solo of the Month group, this time the Presto from Tromlitz's Partita in G major - this was a great exercise for a couple of different reasons, from using the different F# fingerings to avoiding cracking on delicate notes on the keyed flute. And yes, I got water under the key on that G#😅
It's a bit tricky rhythmically to get the right swing, the piece definitely has an attitude! I'm not happy with everything yet, and I think partly is because I'm influenced by the word "presto" unnecessarily. Like I told my workshop participants lately, speed contributes to an affect, but speed itself doesn't express much. Although presto does mean "quickly", the piece sounds really fun (and above all, really fun to play!) when there's that rustic, burlesque character to it. To do so, you'll need just a bit of time to express those subtle rhythmic nuances, and rushing past them would simply be less than half the fun. The T R' T' tonguing creates rhythmic stability and interest, and also makes phrases sound much more effortless. Try this with equal tonguing (all t t t) and you'll immediately notice the difference! The application of diverse articulation certainly goes beyond baroque music.🎶 |
ABOUT THE BLOG:I got inspired to document my own observations in flute-playing and music-making. Also, I thought it's important to pass on the teachings of the great Wilbert Hazelzet, as well as many other mentors who have influenced my artistic visions one way or the other. Enjoy this potpourri of tips, inspirations, and musings. ✨CONTRIBUTE!✨Yes I love the writing that I do! If you love them as well, how about consider showing your appreciation with a personal contribution? TOPICS:
|